Investigative.

The war no country has ever won

Fire ants are a ‘super pest’ worse than anything Australia has seen before

The pigs arrived on the First Fleet. Then came the camels. Then the cats, the foxes and the rabbits.

The cane toads came in 1935.

And then came the fire ants.

Red imported fire ants are a ‘super pest’ that could cost the Australian economy more than $1.5 billion each year – nearly double all of Australia’s worst invasive species, combined.

Biosecurity Queensland lead scientist Dr Ross Wylie said it’s a figure that makes the ant one of the most feared and destructive species to have landed on Australia’s shores.

“The red imported fire ant, its name is Solenopsis invicta and ‘invicta’ means unconquered,” said Dr Wylie.

“It’s probably one of the world’s most invasive pests and certainly the most invasive ant species in the world,” he said.


The first fire ants were detected in Brisbane in 2001.

Their discovery had federal and state governments declare a ‘national emergency’ as they scrambled to reform biosecurity laws and launch a $123 million five-year program to stamp out the ant.

But twenty years on, the ants still haven’t been eradicated.

What if we lose the war?

Invasive Species Council CEO Andrew Cox said a widespread fire ant invasion would be a disaster for Australia’s wildlife, farmers, and the Australian outdoor way of life.

“[Fire ants] overwhelm all the insect life in the area, they can attack small birds… they make farms unsafe places for workers, they can attack newly born calves,” said Mr Cox.

“Grassy areas that we can sit down on without getting bitten, they change that, because fire ants when disturbed will rapidly attack any person that comes nearby.”

“Only if you’ve had to live with the fire ants, do you understand why they’re such a bad thing”.

ABOVE: First detected in Brisbane in 2001, fire ant ‘super pests’ hitchhike on cargo ships from the Americas bound for Australian ports.

Data source: Department of Agriculture and Fisheries.

Last month, a fire ant outbreak in Yarrabilba, Logan, forced football fields to shut and left dozens of homeowners and children stung.

One Yarrabilba women Casey Rixon had armed herself with a can of fly spray after fire ants invaded her garden and began swarming along her garage door.

“I had to open the garage manually and they fell all over me,” she said.

“I contacted Biosecurity [Queensland] and they turned up about 4 days later, put something down the hole of the nest and marked it pink.”

Mrs Rixon said she had seen no fire ants since the treatment but warned Brisbane homeowners to be careful.

“Watch for any mounds in your garden, watch yourself and kids, and do some research especially if you suffer from severe allergic reactions or anaphylaxis,” she said.

“Only if you’ve had to live with the fire ants, do you understand why they’re such a bad thing”.

Source: Wade Marie Tay

It's been 20 years. So what’s the hold up?

Dr Wylie said the fire ant eradication program had been “on track” for eradication back in 2005.

“At the start of the program, we were treating a large [40,000 hectare] area with all sorts of buffers, in areas where we thought the ant was.”

“But what put the program back was the discovery of a large infestation way beyond the area where the program was operating, in an old abandoned mine site [west of Brisbane].”

“The ant was just able to proliferate,” he said.

Since 2001, fire ants have spread over 500,000 hectares from the coastal suburbs of Brisbane to the Scenic Rim in the south and the Lockyer Valley in the west.

Researcher and longstanding critic of the program Dr Pam Swepson said the failure to correctly define the boundary of the infestation was an “admission” that the program didn’t work.

“[The program] has got three things to do: it’s got to find fire ants, it’s got to stop them spreading, and it’s got to kill them,” she said.

Dr Swepson had raised concerns about the program’s effectiveness 19 years ago after leaving her role as the program’s community engagement manager.

She claimed management had ignored expert advice and moved dozens of surveillance staff to treatment roles early in the program, instead of having them find the infestation boundary.

“What the Americans said to us to do was to overestimate the extent of the infestation we have now, and systematically bait an area much bigger than what we expected, because there is a likelihood there will be ants beyond where we think there is.”

“They said that’s the only chance we got – not to eradicate, just to suppress."

Pam Swepson says authorities failed to locate the spread of the fire ant invasion in the early stages of the eradication program. Source: Pam Swepson

Last-ditch effort: a new eradication program

Biosecurity Queensland launched a new $411.4 million fire ant eradication program in 2017 after an independent review found it was still possible to eradicate the ant.

The program outlined a ten-year plan to gradually eradicate the ants, beginning with colonies in the Lockyer Valley and moving east towards Brisbane.

Meanwhile, communities waiting for full eradication treatment were asked to report fire ant sightings and given baits from Biosecurity Queensland to keep the ants from spreading further.

Dr Wylie said the strategy seemed to be working.

“In some of the areas where full-blown eradication is going on, people haven’t been seeing fire ants for a while, whereas they were quite common previously.”

“We’ve already covered perhaps 250,000 hectares with a tremendous reduction of what was in those areas.”

In Australia, fire ants have spread at a rate of 4.8 kilometres each year since 2001, compared to an estimated 48 kilometres per year in the southern United States and 80 kilometres in China.

Sean Hodge, who conducted surveillance last year in the Lockyer Valley’s Laidley region, agreed the program seemed to be “fairly effective” but said not all properties were receiving full treatment.

“Several times we’ve found ants where there shouldn’t have been ants anymore,” he said.

Mr Hodge said those nests tended to occur near properties that his team had not been able to access for surveillance or treatment.

“It comes down to management – we’re meant to have the authority to go onto any property no matter what,” he said.

“When landowners or farmers reject us and reject us, the idea is that it gets raised up to management and eventually if they keep refusing, we turn up with the police in tow to let us on and treat the property.”

“If you’re not doing that then you’re not going to get 100 percent coverage and you’ll have these nests pop up, and next thing you know, these things spread like wildfire,” he said.

Biosecurity Queensland has been collecting data on the whereabouts of fire ants for over twenty years.

In 2011, fire ant populations were most dense in the Ipswich and Lockyer Valley regions.

By 2020, eradication programs had pushed those ants further east towards Logan and the Gold Coast.

Populations were now less dense, but much more spread out.

The eradication program aims to have over 95 percent of the Lockyer Valley and Ipswich regions free of fire ants by 2023.

A spokesperson from the National Red Imported Fire Ant Eradication Program said ant numbers had been "significantly knocked down" after three years of intensive eradication treatment.

The detection problem: 'you can't say that the ants aren't there'

Dr Wylie said knowing whether treatments had worked was the biggest challenge facing the eradication program.

“You can’t say that the ants aren’t there, all you can say is that we didn’t find them,” he said.

“You may not see any evidence of an ant at all for five months, yet the ant is there.”

Fire ants are easiest to detect in the winter months as they build their nests, but in summer, the ants tend to stay underground.

Dr Wylie said fire ant baits can also take up to two years and six treatments to kill off a persistent colony.

“I can think of 14 different reasons why a fire ant may not take a bait we put out,” said Dr Wylie.

“It might be too hot, too cold; they might have already eaten; a cow might have put a foot through the nest and they’re too busy rebuilding.”

A spokesperson from the National Red Imported Fire Ant Eradication Program said fire ant surveillance will be undertaken over a number of years before they can confidently say fire ants are no longer present.

The program can declare an area ‘fire-ant free’ only if the community, professional teams, sniffer dogs and remote-sensing helicopters find no new nests after two rounds of surveillance over two years.

Biosecurity Queensland field officers use odour detection dogs to find fire ants. Source: Qld Department of Agriculture and Fisheries

Field officers spread baits to sterilise the fire ant queen. Source: Qld Department of Agriculture and Fisheries

The invasives of the future

Invasive Species Council CEO Andrew Cox said fire ants aren’t the only small invasives that can slip past Australia’s border control and cause a biosecurity disaster.

“Any day now we could have a new ‘fire ant’-type ant species, a new ‘super plant’ weed come to Australia, and we would have more extinctions than we are currently already facing,” Mr Cox said.

“Some of the big obvious animals we’re getting better at keeping out, but the smaller stowaways like the red fire ants, like all the bugs that might be in your packaging that you bought over eBay, are becoming more of a problem.”

Mr Cox said the pressure for importers to check goods cheaper and faster is a recipe for poor biosecurity practices, quarantine measures and apathy towards keeping imports free of pests and diseases.

“The rate of arrivals isn’t going lower, it’s getting higher. The risk is getting greater,” he said.

“Things are probably getting worse before they’re getting better.”

Former Queensland Farmers’ Federation President Stuart Armitage said the fire ant eradication program relies on everyone doing their part in reporting suspect ants and nests.

“A lot of people seem to think that biosecurity is just a problem for agriculture – it’s not. Everyone has a role to play and a general biosecurity obligation.”

“Australia is the closest any country has come to eradicating fire ants, and if any state can do it, Queensland can.”

Published Works.
Infographic.

‘Imagine tons of footballs but no football fields’: Desperate bikers build illegal tracks in Brisbane bush

Children as young as 12-years-old are among those facing council crackdown over illegal bike trail building in reserves across southeast Brisbane.

Bike riders have built dozens of dirt mound jumps, knocked down endangered trees and cut steep tracks through ravines in bushland where riding is prohibited, including at Seven Hills Bushland Reserve, White Hills Reserve and Belmont Hills Reserve.

Seven Hills mother-of-two Suzi Robertson said children had to build their own trails as existing bike facilities at Mt Coot-tha and Daisy Hill were too far away.

“My child in lockdown with his 30-minute break between lessons used to be able to hop on his bike and ride in the bush and be back for the next lesson,” said Ms Robertson.

“There is nowhere else where they can take their bike out like that.”

But recent mountain bike activities have scared off wildlife, destroyed native plants and caused ankle-deep cavities and cracks to develop across the conservation zones.

Brisbane Off-Road Riders Alliance (BORRA) President Dan Crawford said there is a need for more mountain bike facilities in fast-growing residential suburbs.

“You’ve got the footballs, but no football fields,” said Mr Crawford.

“Mountain bikes are getting sold, and councils and governments are encouraging us to ride bikes, but at the moment they’re not meeting supply.”

The council has since flattened several dirt jumps and installed surveillance cameras in the Seven Hills reserve, while an unknown group has placed logs, boulders and concrete pylons across tracks used by bikers.

Cavendish Road State High School student Dylan Wildman said a hard approach to mountain biking won’t stop youth from building trails.

“Kids are going to find new and different ways to do the same stuff: riding bikes in new places, building new trails,” he said.

“The solution is to build sustainable trails that are going to last a long time and going to still support the natural environment.”

Mr Wildman has founded a mountain biking club at his school to organise trips to bushland reserves, which has since grown to 40 members.

Outdoors Queensland executive Dom Courtney warned that a hard crackdown on youth bikers would discourage children who have been making the effort to be physically active.

“It’s really not good enough to go ‘nah, you’re not allowed to do that activity in that place’. We need to understand why,” said Mr Courtney. “There’s mountain biking allowed at Mt Coot-ha and there’s some awesome mountain bike trails there, but not everyone can get to Mt Coot-tha easily to go for a ride.”

One report from the Australian Institute of Family Studies found 85 percent of Australian children did not meet the recommended 60-minutes of exercise per day.

“Let’s not forget that the youth and young people are an important part of all our communities,” he said.

Mountain biker Akira Garrett, 15, said he wanted to work with authorities to build bike jumps that wouldn’t damage the environment.

“[The council] were going to talk to me about how to sustainably create mountain bike trails in Brisbane, and the email I got back from [their] office was just telling me to stop.”

“Nobody’s working with me, nobody’s helping me prevent this.”

BORRA president Dan Crawford said illegal trail building made it more difficult to work with authorities to expand the Brisbane trail network.

“Mountain bikers generally are very environmentally conscious – it's embedded into the DNA of the sport,” said Mr Crawford.

“We’re all here to save the forest, to save nature. We don’t want to be riding on concrete paths or concrete jungles,” he said.

A survey conducted by BORRA found environmentally friendly and sustainable trail design was ‘important’ or ‘very important’ to over 95 per cent of Brisbane mountain bikers, more important than trail variety or public transport access.

“Mountain bikers and catchment groups should really be on the same page,” said Mr Crawford. “We’re pushing for the same things.”

A conservationist affected by illegal trail building agreed with Mr Crawford but said reserves at Seven Hills and Whites Hill would be too small for mountain biking.

“Anything you did in here would have a proportionally large impact on the environment,” said the conservationist, who asked not to be named.

“You can open it up and some people will be responsible, but a hell of a lot of people won’t be.”

The conservation group had shovels, pickaxes and wheelbarrows stolen after their tool shed was smashed in last month.

“A resolution has to be found,” the conservationist said.

“That’s all I can say, and I honestly don’t know what it [the solution] is.”

Council plans to expand Brisbane’s trail network were due to be released this month but have since been delayed.

However, Mr Wildman said he was optimistic about the future of mountain biking in Brisbane.

“We want challenges,” he said. “What’s your next challenge, what’s your next goal?”

“That’s at the heart of what mountain biking is about.”